Score one for grammar
Aug. 7th, 2006 10:32 amFrom today's Globe and Mail: The $2.13 million comma.
I absolutely agree with the interpretation and the cancellation of the contract, not because I dislike Rogers per se, but because their lawyers, as all lawyers, should be the most anal-retentive grammar geeks ever and should have spotted the enormous change of meaning that this second comma gave to the sentence.
Remember kids: one comma splits a sentence in two parts, linked in meaning yet seperate. Two commas create a subordinate clause which can be lifted from the sentence and the rest, before the first and after the second comma, read as a full sentence in its own right.
And the previous paragraph is the best example I can give of that difference. :)
I absolutely agree with the interpretation and the cancellation of the contract, not because I dislike Rogers per se, but because their lawyers, as all lawyers, should be the most anal-retentive grammar geeks ever and should have spotted the enormous change of meaning that this second comma gave to the sentence.
Remember kids: one comma splits a sentence in two parts, linked in meaning yet seperate. Two commas create a subordinate clause which can be lifted from the sentence and the rest, before the first and after the second comma, read as a full sentence in its own right.
And the previous paragraph is the best example I can give of that difference. :)